 |
| Tax Tips |
|
IRS Warns Business and
Individuals to Watch for Questionable Employment Tax Practices
|
| The Internal Revenue Service issued an alert for eight schemes where
federal employment taxes were not properly withheld or paid by employers. |
|
There are many reasons employers don’t withhold or pay
employment taxes.
For some, it may
be an attempt to use the government as a bank to “borrow" the money for a short
while with good intentions to pay it back later.
For others, it may be a situation where an employer collects the taxes
and elects to keep the money during a period of financial difficulty rather than
pay it to the IRS.
For a small
number, it involves philosophical differences with the tax law of the
United States that courts consistently reject.
Regardless of the reason, federal law requires employment tax withholding and
payment by employers.
Employment taxes consist of federal income tax withholding
along with Social Security and Medicare taxes and unemployment taxes.
Also, many states have withholding for various employment-related taxes,
such as contributions to a worker’s compensation fund.
Improper reporting or payment of employment taxes affects the ease with
which employees can claim future benefits from these programs.
The IRS takes a variety of steps to combat employment tax
non-compliance.
The agency has a
number of civil actions it can take like audits and filing liens against
property the taxpayer owns.
In
addition to civil actions, IRS Criminal Investigation investigates and refers
for prosecution individuals and businesses that have willfully attempted to
avoid filing and paying employment taxes. These efforts have led to significant
criminal convictions resulting in incarceration and fines.
The IRS urges all businesses to resist the temptation to
become involved in or victimized by unlawful activities.
The eight most common types of employment tax noncompliance include:
-
Pyramiding. “Pyramiding” of
employment taxes is a fraudulent practice where a business withholds taxes
from its employees but intentionally fails to remit them to the IRS. Often,
the cause is a lack of profit or capital for operating costs, so the
business owner uses the trust funds to pay other liabilities. The quarterly
employment tax liabilities accumulate until the employer has little hope of
catching up. A business involved in pyramiding either shuts down or files
bankruptcy and then starts a new business under different name, starting the
cycle all over again.
-
Unreliable Third Party Payers. There are two primary categories of
third party payers: Payroll Service Providers and Professional Employer
Organizations. Payroll Service Providers typically perform services for
employers such as filing employment tax returns and making employment tax
payments. Professional Employer Organizations offer employee leasing.
That is, they handle administrative, personnel, and payroll
accounting functions for employees who have been leased to other companies
that use their services. Many of these companies provide outstanding
services to employers. Unfortunately, in some instances, companies of both
types of services have failed to pay the collected employment taxes to the
IRS. When these employment services companies dissolve, millions in
employment taxes can be left unpaid. Employers are urged to exercise due
diligence in selecting and monitoring a third party payer. For example, when
choosing a third party payer, employers should look for one that is
reputable and uses the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System. This allows
the business owners to verify payments made on their behalf. Also, an
employer should never allow their address of record with the IRS to be
changed to that of the third party payer.
-
Frivolous Arguments. Unscrupulous individuals and promoters have used
a variety of false or misleading arguments for not paying employment taxes.
These schemes are based on an incorrect interpretation of the tax law. One
variation of this scheme involves the improper use of Form 941c, "Supporting
Statement to Correct Information on Form 941," to attempt to get a refund of
previously paid employment taxes.
-
Offshore Employee Leasing. This scheme, which was designated as a
“Listed Transaction” by the Service misuses the otherwise legal business
practices of employee leasing. Under the typical promotion, an individual
taxpayer supposedly resigns from his or her current employer or Professional
Corporation and signs an employment contract with an offshore employee
leasing company. The offshore company indirectly leases the individual’s
services back to the original employer using a domestic leasing company as
an intermediary. After entering into the leasing arrangement, the individual
performs the same services as previously. While the total amount paid for
the individuals’ services stays the same or increases, most of the funds are
sent offshore as “deferred” compensation. The “deferred” compensation is
then paid to the individual as a loan or ends up in an account under the
individual’s control.
-
Misclassifying Worker Status: Sometimes employers incorrectly treat
employees as independent contractors to avoid paying employment taxes.
Generally if the payer has the right to control what work will be done and
how it will be done, the worker is an employee.
Employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors will
be liable for the employment taxes on wages paid to the misclassified worker
and subject to penalties.
-
Paying Employees in Cash: Paying employees in whole or partially in
cash is a common method of evading income and employment taxes. There is
nothing wrong with compensating an employee in cash, but employment taxes
are owed regardless of how employees are paid. And the IRS will build its
case using all available information even if there are no payroll records or
checks.
-
Filing False Payroll Tax Returns or Failing to File Payroll Tax Returns:
Preparing false payroll tax returns, intentionally understating the amount
of wages on which taxes are owed or failing to file employment tax returns
are methods commonly used to evade employment taxes.
-
S Corporation Officers Compensation Treated as Corporate Distributions:
In an effort to avoid employment taxes, some S Corporations are improperly
treating officers’ compensation as a corporate distribution instead of wages
or salary. By law, officers are employees of the corporation for employment
tax purposes and compensation they receive for their services is subject to
employment taxes.
The IRS encourages employees to report any concerns that an
employer is failing to properly withhold any pay federal income and employment
taxes.
|